JarvisBitz Tech
System Blueprint

Search Blueprint

Ingest → Embed → Index → Retrieve → Re-Rank → Present. Intelligent search from raw data to ranked results.

The Pipeline

Six stages from raw data to ranked results

Click any stage for technical depth.

01

Data Ingestion

Multi-source connectors, format parsing, incremental sync, deduplication.

Raw data flows in from REST APIs, databases, file stores, webhooks, and third-party SaaS platforms. Format-aware parsers normalize structured, semi-structured, and unstructured content into a clean canonical form. Change-detection and incremental sync ensure only new or modified records enter the pipeline, while deduplication guards prevent redundant processing.

Technical Stack
REST API connectors
Database connectors
File parsers
Webhook listeners
Change detection
Queue management
PIPELINE ACTIVE
Stage 1/6How RAG works →
Search Strategies

Four retrieval paradigms compared

Each strategy has distinct strengths. Hybrid search combines the best of keyword and semantic for production workloads.

Keyword (BM25)

Term-frequency matching with inverse document frequency weighting. The workhorse of traditional search.

Strengths
Exact match precision
Blazing fast
No model dependencies
Interpretable scoring
Trade-offs
No semantic understanding
Misses synonyms
Vocabulary mismatch

Semantic (Vector)

Embedding-based search that matches by meaning, not surface text. Handles paraphrasing and synonyms naturally.

Strengths
Meaning-based matching
Handles synonyms
Cross-lingual potential
Robust to typos
Trade-offs
Needs embedding model
Higher latency
Opaque scoring

Hybrid

Fuses dense vector search with sparse keyword matching via reciprocal rank fusion for the best of both worlds.

Strengths
Best overall accuracy
Semantic + exact match
Tunable fusion weights
Production-proven
Trade-offs
More infrastructure
Dual index maintenance
Tuning complexity

Multi-Modal

Unified search across text, images, and structured data using multi-modal embedding models.

Strengths
Cross-modal retrieval
Image + text queries
Richer understanding
Unified index
Trade-offs
Requires multi-modal embeddings
Larger vectors
Higher compute cost
Embedding Models

Embedding selection guide

Your embedding model is the foundation of search quality. We benchmark against your domain data to find the optimal choice.

01

OpenAI · standard tier

Dims:1,536
MTEB:61.0
Latency:~50ms
Cost:$$
02

Cohere · Embed

Dims:1,024
MTEB:64.5
Latency:~40ms
Cost:$$
03

BAAI · BGE (large)

Dims:1,024
MTEB:63.9
Latency:~15ms
Cost:Self-host
04

Microsoft · E5 (self-host)

Dims:4,096
MTEB:66.6
Latency:~120ms
Cost:Self-host
05

Voyage AI · embeddings

Dims:1,024
MTEB:65.1
Latency:~45ms
Cost:$$
06

Alibaba · GTE

Dims:3,584
MTEB:67.2
Latency:~100ms
Cost:Self-host

Benchmarks based on the MTEB leaderboard. Actual performance varies by domain — we run A/B evaluations against your data before committing to a model.

Build intelligent search for your data.

Describe your data sources and search requirements. We'll design the embedding, indexing, and retrieval pipeline.